CO129-322 - Acting Governor May - 1904 [1-5] — Page 748

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

744

decided that no late claim shall be granted.

The main result of my proposals will be entirely to eliminate the taxlords. The advantage that will bring to the Government is obvious and cannot be overestimated. The principal are:-

(1) The inevitable litigation between taxlords and their lessees will be entirely avoided, and thereby a fruitful source of disturbance in the New Territory will be obviated. There will be no need for a rent recovery ordinance, the S.C.O. will not be besieged with taxlord petitions, and the work of the Summary Court relieved. If on the other hand the taxlords are made owners, the Government will have imposed upon itself the obligation of making the perpetual lessees pay rent, and will constantly have difficult disputes to settle.

(3) If the taxlord is made owner, the Crown Rent on land in the New Territory can never be increased, and in fact must be always curtailed in order to make it something less than the rent paid to the taxlord by his perpetual lessee. Otherwise, as shown above, the taxlords will be ruined.

My recommendation is, that all taxlord claims of the kind which I have described having been disallowed by the Land Court as legally invalid, thereafter these cases should be executively settled with a view to eliminating the taxlords and putting in the perpetual lessees as Crown Lessees.

I may add that it has been ruled both in judgments given by the Land Court itself and by two recent judgments of the Supreme Court on appeal that the Land Court sits to hear cases under the strict letter of the Chinese law. If then either the taxlords or their lessees are to be given title to land, it must be given as an act of executive settlement, not by judgment of the Land Court.

Finally, with regard to the instructions of the Secretary of State that special consideration should be shown in cases of prolonged occupation and improvements, it must be remembered that the lessees, not the taxlords, are the occupants: and that any improvements made are due, not to the taxlords, but to the lessees. I believe therefore that the policy which I recommend would be approved by the

Edit History

2026-06-01 17:44:38 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
744 decided that no late claim shall be granted. The main result of my proposals will be entirely to eliminate the taxlords. The advantage that will bring to the Government is obvious and cannot be overestimated. The principal are:- (1) The inevitable litigation between taxlords and their lessees will be entirely avoided, and thereby a fruitful source of disturbance in the New Territory will be obviated. There will be no need for a rent recovery ordinance, the S.C.O. will not be besieged with taxlord petitions, and the work of the Summary Court relieved. If on the other hand the taxlords are made owners, the Government will have imposed upon itself the obligation of making the perpetual lessees pay rent, and will constantly have difficult disputes to settle. (3) If the taxlord is made owner, the Crown Rent on land in the New Territory can never be increased, and in fact must be always curtailed in order to make it something less than the rent paid to the taxlord by his perpetual lessee. Otherwise, as shown above, the taxlords will be ruined. My recommendation is, that all taxlord claims of the kind which I have described having been disallowed by the Land Court as legally invalid, thereafter these cases should be executively settled with a view to eliminating the taxlords and putting in the perpetual lessees as Crown Lessees. I may add that it has been ruled both in judgments given by the Land Court itself and by two recent judgments of the Supreme Court on appeal that the Land Court sits to hear cases under the strict letter of the Chinese law. If then either the taxlords or their lessees are to be given title to land, it must be given as an act of executive settlement, not by judgment of the Land Court. Finally, with regard to the instructions of the Secretary of State that special consideration should be shown in cases of prolonged occupation and improvements, it must be remembered that the lessees, not the taxlords, are the occupants: and that any improvements made are due, not to the taxlords, but to the lessees. I believe therefore that the policy which I recommend would be approved by the
Baseline (Original)
744 decided that no late claim shall be granted. t The main result of my orooosals will be entirely eliminate the taxlords. The advantage that will bring to the Government is obvious and cannot be overestimated. The princiaol are:- (1) The evitable litization between taxlords and their lessees will be entirely avoided, and thereby a fruitful source of disturbance in the New Territory will be obviated. There will be no need for a rent recovery ordinance, the 8.3.0. will not be besieged with taxlord petitions, and the work of the Summary Court relieved. If on the other hand the taxlords are made owners. the Government will have inposed woon itself the obligation of making the perpetual lessees pay rent, and will constantly have difficult disoutes to settle. (3) If the taxlord is made owner, the Crown Rent on land in the New Territory can never be increased, and in fact must be always cur- tailed in order to make it something less than the rent paid to the taxlord by his perpetual lessee. Otherwise, as shown above, the tax- lords will be ruined. My recommendation is, that all taxlord claims of the kind which I have described having been disallowed by the Land Court as le- gally invalid, thereafter these cases should be executively settled with a view to eliminating the taxlords and putting in the perpetual lessees as Crown Lessees. I may add that it has been ruled both in judgments given by the Land Court itself and by two recent judgments of the Supreme Court on appeal that the Land Court sits to hear cases under the strict letter of the Chinese law. If then either the taxlords or their lessees are to be given title to land, it must be given as on act of executive settlement, not by judgment of the Land Court. Finally, with regard to the instructions of the Secretary of State that special consideration should be shown in cases of pro- longed occupation and improvements, it must be remembered that the lessees, not the baxlords, are the occupants: and that any improve- I believe ments made are due, not to the taxlords, but to the lessees. therefore that the policy which I recommend would be approved by the
2026-06-01 17:44:38 · Baseline
View content

744

decided that no late claim shall be granted.

t

The main result of my orooosals will be entirely eliminate the taxlords. The advantage that will bring to the Government is obvious

and cannot be overestimated. The princiaol are:-

(1)

The evitable litization between taxlords and their lessees will be entirely avoided, and thereby a fruitful source of disturbance in the New Territory will be obviated. There will be no need for a rent recovery ordinance, the 8.3.0. will not be besieged with taxlord petitions, and the work of the Summary Court relieved. If on the other hand the taxlords are made owners. the Government will have inposed

woon itself the obligation of making the perpetual lessees pay rent,

and will constantly have difficult disoutes to settle.

(3)

If the taxlord is made owner, the Crown Rent on land in the

New Territory can never be increased, and in fact must be always cur-

tailed in order to make it something less than the rent paid to the

taxlord by his perpetual lessee. Otherwise, as shown above, the tax-

lords will be ruined.

My recommendation is, that all taxlord claims of the kind

which I have described having been disallowed by the Land Court as le- gally invalid, thereafter these cases should be executively settled

with a view to eliminating the taxlords and putting in the perpetual

lessees as Crown Lessees.

I may add that it has been ruled both in judgments given

by the Land Court itself and by two recent judgments of the Supreme Court on appeal that the Land Court sits to hear cases under the

strict letter of the Chinese law. If then either the taxlords or their lessees are to be given title to land, it must be given as on act of executive settlement, not by judgment of the Land Court.

Finally, with regard to the instructions of the Secretary of State that special consideration should be shown in cases of pro- longed occupation and improvements, it must be remembered that the lessees, not the baxlords, are the occupants: and that any improve-

I believe ments made are due, not to the taxlords, but to the lessees.

therefore that the policy which I recommend would be approved by the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.